NAR Urges Congress, Administration to Approach Changing FHA Slowly
The National Association of Realtors® urged Congress and the administration
to move cautiously before making changes to the Federal Housing
Administration program that has served the needs of millions of American
families for more than 75 years without needing a federal appropriation.
FHA
remains financially strong because it has taken steps to ensure solid
underwriting standards and responsible lending practices, said Charles
McMillan, NAR immediate past president, in testimony before the House
Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity today.
"As the leading advocate for housing issues, NAR believes that one of the
best ways Congress can help strengthen FHA is to quickly consider and pass
legislation that would make current loan limits permanent," McMillan said.
"It's important to note that higher balance FHA loans perform better than
lower balance ones. While some argue that higher balance loans put taxpayers
at risk, such loans actually strengthen the program and reduce risk to the
fund."
NAR strongly supports H.R. 2483, the "Increasing Homeownership Opportunities
Act." Current FHA loan limits are as high as $729,750 in high-cost areas,
and are set to expire at the end of the year and revert to lower amounts,
greatly hindering the housing recovery process. A decrease of current limits
would adversely affect 612 counties in 40 states and the District of
Columbia.
Explaining that FHA has played an important role in the recent housing and
economic crisis by filing the gap left by private lenders, McMillan said FHA
insured almost 30 percent of single-family mortgages in 2009 and more than
50 percent of first-time buyer loans. "Historically, FHA's market share has
hovered between 10 and 15 percent of all loans. And when the private market
is strong enough to return, we welcome a reduced FHA market share," he said.
McMillan said NAR strongly opposes H.R. 3706 that would raise the FHA
downpayment. "While that would increase an individual's investment in the
home, it would not add a penny to FHA's reserves and would disenfranchise
many FHA borrowers," he said.
NAR also opposes a new FHA initiative that increased the up-front mortgage
insurance premium (MIP) from 1.75 percent to 2.25 percent because it adds to
the closing costs home buyers already face. NAR supports legislation to
reasonably increase the annual MIP to replace FHA capital reserves, but in
turn, FHA should reduce the up-front premium due at the closing table.
McMillan said NAR was also concerned that FHA wanted to decrease seller
concessions to 3 percent. Reducing seller concessions could put
homeownership out of reach for many buyers, he said, because it could
require buyers to pay more at closing.
McMillan applauded FHA's stepped up enforcement and oversight of lenders
making FHA loans. In 2009, FHA removed approval of or suspended 274 lenders.
"Realtors® support adding more tools to help FHA protect borrowers and
taxpayers," he said.